| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
21. Something is missing between lvl 3 and lvl 4 (kill) agent missions. - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Hardest lvl 3 - | - Small Gap | - Easiest lvl 4 - | | | - Big gap | | | - Hardest lvl 4 The gap between lvl 3 & 4 really is not that big. Considering that you can now reject one mission every few hours without penalty, if you can fly ...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.23 12:16:00
|
22. delete please - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Should mission running have higher rewards in lower sec ? Yep, I've no problem with that. Will altering mission rewards make a large difference to income ? No, bounties and loot have too big an influence on the overall reward. Will this change m...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.23 12:07:00
|
23. My list of stuff that ruins pvp. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. Missiles: Missiles are broken (broken /= overpowered btw). Sooner we get a fix the better. 2. Map: There have been so many discussions/ suggestions about this, including from devs. Next patch will help, but I'm not sure why more hasn't been do...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.23 11:08:00
|
24. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jernau Gurgeh Say you're a producer and your rivals are undercutting you. Your sales are dropping. What do you do? Well you could of course cut your prices as well, but that would lead to a general lowering of profits. A far...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 16:21:00
|
25. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Valentine Keen Strangely enough I said much the same when the Shiva discussions were being held - I could see no reason, given the 0.0 focus of alliances, to form officially, since they didn't like Empire wars in the first p...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 13:16:00
|
26. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Valentine Keen Secondly, yes under the war system alliances are EXACTLY one big corp. If you don't want that, don't be an alliance. I always find it amusing how people arguing against something so often manage to reveal t...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 12:51:00
|
27. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Valentine Keen I do blame the alliances. I don't blame the game. Then with all due respect, you're an idiot. Originally by: Valentine Keen Defending your weaker members is the same problem for any corp or all...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 12:23:00
|
28. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Valentine Keen They didn't operate as alliances before, trying now is what is the shock to the system. That doesn't make alliances broken or wars unfair. They're not operating as alliances now. They're operating as big ea...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 12:01:00
|
29. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Trooper B99 Yes, you can do most things from empire in 0.0. Maybe for slightly less isk in most cases. And if that doesn't sum up the biggest single problem in Eve atm then I don't know what does. Originally by: T...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 11:37:00
|
30. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Trooper B99 Woa, wait a minute here. You aren't forced to go to empire to make money. Sure you can hunt npcs for bounties. If you're lucky you can get some great loot too. You can mine to get valuable minerals too, ea...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 11:00:00
|
31. Nafri thought of Alliances, 0.0 and Empire (no Spamm inside) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I finally starting to believe that people are seeing how so many of the issues people are raising at the moment all come from the same basic problem. 0.0 is fubar. 0.0 should be the paragon of achievement in Eve. It's the Dragons Lair, the Dea...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.18 10:38:00
|
32. Ore thieves i can live with. Loot stealers must hang - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I can't agree with this thread entirely, as I have yet to hear a good reason why missions should be the one sole aspect of this game that is completely devoid of open player interaction, which is effectively what people are asking for. On the oth...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.17 15:45:00
|
33. well goodbye all - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
* snip * Congratulations on making it out. Even more so if you manage to resist coming back.
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.17 15:11:00
|
34. Replies you'd like to give your agent ! - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Dude, quit hacking my teamspeak channel. If you give me angel extravaganza one more time after I've said 'just one more mission', then there's gonna be trouble.
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.17 14:37:00
|
35. I am a Jack of all trades - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nice to see this thread is still going, I thought it had died off. I still feel that 0.0 has failed to develop at the rate the rest of the game has. POSs were intended to provide a major content boost for 0.0, but they have failed to meet expecta...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.17 14:11:00
|
36. "Beams not very useful" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rod, I'm going to have to admit that upon re-reading your post I probably read through it a little fast last time. Like yourself I have no desire to rehash old arguments, so I will simply say that your questioning why the apoc has 2 bonuses on top...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.17 13:49:00
|
37. "Beams not very useful" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rod Blaine Beams are compensated for the lack of damage bonuses found on amarr ships in general and ofc the apoc specifically. This means that where one would expect them to do a base damage that is equal to other weapons's ...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.17 13:14:00
|
38. "Beams not very useful" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Do you know what really needs a boost ? Beam laser threads. I mean, the mega pulse threads we've had recently were undeniably uber. Arguments for the nerfing of range/tracking/damage just pwned all the other threads, striking perfectly and wrecki...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.17 11:04:00
|
39. Webber changes ruin ceptors??? Say ur opinion - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Where's the room for opinion ? You've said all there is to say. Webber changes ruin ceptors, end of story.
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.16 16:18:00
|
40. Pulses nerf, OK! But why not Torp nerf? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This is the sort of ignorance that leads to the problems we have with nerfs/boosts leaving things less balanced than they were before. Basically, what you are saying is that your em/thermal damage was less effective than your friends kinetic dama...
- by Toran Mehtar - at 2005.03.16 16:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |